Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
1. Otherwise, how would most people ever hear of the Association of American Studies?
2. Words like "human rights violations" are not scary to direct toward democratic countries with academic freedom.
3. Who would boycott China, Zimbabwe, Iran or Russia?
4. The boycott is "symbolic" and symbolic is cool on so many levels.
5. Singling out Israel and no other country does not indicate bias; how could you suggest that?
6. The ASA is not aware of the diversity of Israeli universities.
7. The ASA is not impressed that even Mahmoud Abbas opposes boycotting Israel.
8. The American Association of University Professors opposes academic boycotts but who cares? (Membership of AAUP: 47,000, of ASA: under 5000; 1252 voted with two-thirds for boycott.)
9. No one at a university in the Middle East actually benefits from this resolution.
10.There is no downside to the resolution for the lives of its promoters.
December 20, 2013
December 14, 2013
Jerusalem of Snow
It's the biggest storm in decades; the roads are closed in and out of Jerusalem and there is snow or rain falling over most of the country. There are power outages and there are many people who had to be rescued from their cars. It's also beautiful and magical.
Meanwhile, John Kerry is here again this time thanking his Israeli and Palestinian hosts for the warm welcome and for (literally) clearing his pathway traveling the (literally) treacherous road between Ramallah and Jerusalem. The NYTimes reported on the snow's snarling of diplomacy.
Snow is nice the way it quiets everything. Time to sit back and watch the bigger-than-words forces of nature.
December 09, 2013
What Boycott? Major Musicians Rock Israel
(published at Honest Reporting )
Yet another star ignores widely publicized
demands to cancel and performs in Israel. Tom Jones even adds a second show. Like
Alicia Keys this summer and Rhianna in October, Jones joins the vast majority
of musicians in standing up to the pressure of boycotters.
In spite of boycott hype, only rare exceptions
like Jello Biafra and Elvis Costello have counted themselves supporters.
Costello nixed his show in June 2010 although his wife, singer Diana Krall,
performed later that summer. Biafra flew to Israel anyway, watched Israeli
punk band Useless ID play without him, and published his mixed feelings about
Boycott, Divestment, and Sanction (BDS).
In fact, even among the few musicians who have canceled,
giving
into pressure or postponing a show does not mean supporting boycott.
When Marc Almond cancelled, his management announced, “Marc would like to make it absolutely clear that this is not for any
political reason. We are very sorry for any inconvenience to fans who have
bought tickets.”
Carlos Santana’s management said, “We are sorry that our schedule has
forced the postponement of certain dates previously scheduled. We look forward
to performing in the many historic places that Santana has long wanted to
return to.”
Yet, these names appear in publicity about BDS as if
they protested against Israel. Even included are some--like Jon Bon Jovi--who
simply have never played in the Jewish state. When asked earlier this year by BBC’s,
Jo Whiley, “Is there anywhere in the world you’d like to play but haven’t yet?”
Bon Jovi immediately answered: “Israel.”
In recent years, many major musicians have
played in Israel, legends like Bob Dylan, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Elton
John, and Leonard Cohen, and performers that are big draws in every genre,
including:
Punk--Marky
Ramone, New York Dolls, Buzzcocks,
Gogol Bordello; NOFX;
Metal--Anthrax,
Judas Priest, Ozzie Ozbourne, Megadeth;
Pop--Lady
Gaga, Madonna, Justin Bieber, Alanis Morissette;
Rock--
Red Hot Chili Peppers, Aerosmith, Linkin Park, Jethro Tull, Guns N’Roses, Rod
Stewart, 30 Seconds to Mars;
Blues—-KM
Williams, Lucky Peterson, Robert Belfour;
Indie--Yo
La Tengo, Deerhoof, Silver Jews, Why?;
Reggae--Ziggy
Marley, Steel Pulse, Easy Star All-Stars;
Grunge--The
Jesus and Mary Chain; Jane’s Addiction, Faith No More;
New
Wave—-Depeche Mode, Peter Murphy;
Electronica—-Pet
Shop Boys, VNV Nation;
R&B--Rhianna,
The Black Eyed Peas, Pitbull, and Alicia Keys.
Responding to boycotters, Keys told the press,
“Music is a universal language that
is meant to unify audiences in peace and love, and that is the spirit of our
show.”
Elton John, on stage in Tel Aviv, raised a
clenched fist and shouted, “Shalom! We’re so happy to be back here! Ain’t
nothing gonna stop us from coming, baby!”
Rather than boycott Israel, well-known
musicians especially appreciate the country. Tablet Magazine’s Liel Leibovitz
writes that Israel’s top security offers the famous a brief holiday in which to
see the sites, and the closely connected, relaxed Israeli music scene creates
opportunity for A List artists to enjoy night life in Tel Aviv, where locals
usually just “see celebrities as people.”
Speculation about whether or not stars will
cancel, or the latest commentary from Roger Waters (formerly of Pink Floyd and now
a boycott spokesman) can give the impression that musicians teeter on the verge
of agreeing with BDS. But BDS does not argue particular policies; they advocate
for the elimination of the Jewish state, demanding all of Israel for Palestine.
Some
with this view send death threats, like Islamist cleric Omar Bakri who
broadcasted before Paul McCartney’s concert, "If
he values his life, Mr. McCartney must not come to Israel."
In Tel Aviv, Sir Paul told the press, “My little bit is to try to bring people together through music…It seems to me that most of the people are quite moderate and would like a solution…They want the governments to decide quite quickly on two states, on two nations rather than this conflict.”
After all, how likely is it for musicians, who include Israel on a world tour, suddenly to align themselves against a goal of peace for two nations and boycott their own show?
In Tel Aviv, Sir Paul told the press, “My little bit is to try to bring people together through music…It seems to me that most of the people are quite moderate and would like a solution…They want the governments to decide quite quickly on two states, on two nations rather than this conflict.”
After all, how likely is it for musicians, who include Israel on a world tour, suddenly to align themselves against a goal of peace for two nations and boycott their own show?
November 28, 2013
Arik Einstein and the Israeli Soundtrack
On the day Arik Einstein dies I understand what my students
and my son’s friends mean when they say, wistfully, as if they had experienced
it, that they wish they’d been there for the sixties. Many things happened in
the sixties, meaning the whole era, that might prompt the
next generations to imagine going back in time. But I think the biggest is the
music.
Were I able to time travel, yes, I’d do a number of things
differently. But I would not change the soundtrack.
Our soundtrack played around the world. It played in Israel
too, though here there was a parallel, wonderful soundtrack playing that, like
most things about Israel, I learned of only when I first visited a dozen years
ago.
I particularly loved Arik Einstein not only for his rich,
soulful voice, but also for the fact that he enunciated so clearly, allowing me,
with very limited Hebrew, to understand a lot of words. I looked up the lyrics
in English for my favorites. I know some songs by heart.
But I’ll never know the words to the Israeli soundtrack; it
can never sing like the soundtrack that defined my growing up.
Arik Einstein’s songs are playing nonstop on the TV and
radio and in the cafes of Tel Aviv; before the funeral a huge gathering took
place at Rabin Square and then at night, along with the first candle on the giant
chanukiah, there were candles on the ground arranged in the shape of a heart and spelling out Arik, and Israelis of all ages singing his songs.
Like the young people who know about the sixties but who
have a different soundtrack playing in their heads, I have a different kind of
sadness along with sharing this loss, a different absence to have not shared
that defining music live.
November 25, 2013
What Kind of Deal with Iran?
Three days after the Supreme Leader of Iran called
Israel a “rabid dog” and said that Israelis are “not human,” a deal was signed
that makes the President of Iran very happy:
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said
on Sunday the deal reached with six world powers in Geneva ‘recognized Iran's
nuclear rights’ by allowing it to continue to enrich uranium and that Tehran's
enrichment activities would proceed similar to before… The
president also said the success of the talks so far was due to the
"guidelines offered" by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
In the USA, John Kerry said “We will stand
by Israel 100%.”
But in Israel, Deputy
Defense Minister Danny Danon denounced the agreement as an ‘excellent deal for
Iran and a dangerous one for the world, neutralizing the sanctions instead of
the centrifuges. The agreement does not dismantle even a single centrifuge or
reactor, but is a critical blow to sanctions.’
Back in the USA, analysis of the actual text of the "interim agreement" confirms that the deal does not ask Iran to give up anything significant
and yet provides it with more money to continue whatever their leaders want to
continue doing – like funding Assad and Hezbollah and building the nuclear
program.
It wasn’t an open mic that caught the Ayatollah’s words -- he was voicing
official state policy (and speaking before cheering crowds chanting "death to
America; death to Israel").
When state sponsored genocidal rhetoric is no big
deal – we have a bad deal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)