July 29, 2014

Paris, Gaza, and the Oldest Hatred

                                                                                             Photo: Reuters / Philippe Wojazer

It seems that attending synagogue in Paris has become more dangerous than running to bomb shelters in Israel. In the past weeks, with Hamas rockets targeting all the cities of Israel, 430 French Jews, mostly young families, arrived to make their home in Israel.  

The world’s third largest Jewish community has in recent years experienced a steady decline of its population due to emigration, mainly to Israel but also to the US and Canada.  The war in Israel will come to an end but dangers for Jews in France, and elsewhere in Europe, will continue unless radical change takes place within Europe, with France the focal point of the greatest threats to Jews. 

It is hard to think of the beautiful city of Paris this way. But the reality is that Jews in Paris have been trapped inside their synagogues while mobs rioted outside throwing Molotov cocktails and chanting  “death to the Jews” and “long live Hamas.”

The pretext of pro-Palestinian protest has been completely shattered as Jewish businesses have been torched and Jewish neighborhoods have become danger zones for their residents.

Even if one holds the position that Israel should not defend itself against Hamas rocket attacks, it should be obvious that shouts of “death to Jews” and the chant, “Jews out of France,” by marchers through Paris back in January (without the Gaza pretext) express raw anti-Semitism. 

Most recently these chants have been accompanied by so much violence that “Paris’s Kristallnacht” is an apt description. According to Paris University professor, Guy Muilliere:

Demonstrators also shouted slogans in favor of a man who had murdered Jewish children: "We are all Mohamed Merah." Merah shot and killed a rabbi and three Jewish children at close range in a schoolyard in Toulouse in 2012; it was the one of the most serious anti-Semitic acts committed in France since the Vichy regime. This was the first time in France that a large crowd proudly identified with a murderer of Jewish children.
…Dozens of windows of Jewish shops and restaurants along the route were broken and covered with yellow labels saying, "boycott Israel". This was the first time that so many Jewish shops and restaurants were attacked during a demonstration in Paris.
In addition, several hundred protesters armed with iron bars, machetes, axes and firebombs, arriving Place de la Bastille, marched to the nearby Don Isaac Abravanel Synagogue on rue de la Roquette. They shouted, "Let's slay the Jews," "Hitler was right," and "Allahu Akbar".
It is encouraging that French Prime Minister, Manuel Valls spoke out on Monday, according to the Jerusalem Post, condemning “the use of anti-Zionist rhetoric as a cover up of anti-Semitic opinions,” though the rioters make no such distinction. He delivered the speech on the anniversary of the 1942 Vil d’Hiv Roundup, a two-day period during which French authorities delivered 12,000 Jews to the Nazis. “The dishonor of France,” said Valls “is to have been an accomplice of the occupier, to have sent men, women, children, to death because they were Jews.”

Also on Monday, after an anti-Israel protest in Toulouse, a man threw firebombs at the Jewish Community Center and was arrested. A local Jewish community leader, Nicole Yardeni, commented, “We endure daily insults and get spat on--a general feeling of anxiety because a part of the population has a poisoned mind that makes it their mission to hurt Jews, regardless of Gaza.”

During an attack last week on a kosher restaurant in the Paris neighborhood Le Marais,  “A worker of the restaurant managed to shutter the restaurant’s anti-burglary bars, preventing the crowd from entering and locking dozens of customers inside. The crowd proceeded to hurl various objects at the windows while shouting ‘bunch of dirty Jews, we will kill you’ and ‘death to the Jews.’”

                                                                                                                 Published at Times of Israel


July 22, 2014

Under-Reporting From Gaza



The news is full of reporting from Gaza--far less from Israel. Most news sources, except in the Israeli and Jewish press, have missed significant information. Here is a top ten of under-reported stories:

10.  Israel continues to provide humanitarian aid to Gaza every day. While rockets are being fired into Israeli cities, Israel delivers tons of food, medical supplies, and thousands of gallons of fuel and gas to the people in Gaza.

9. Israel has set up a field hospital for treating injured Gazans and continues to treat Palestinians, including terrorists, in its hospitals.

8. Hamas blew out its own electrical supply leaving 70,000 people without power. Under rocket fire, Israelis repaired the damage.

7. Billions of foreign aid funds intended for creating infrastructure, businesses, industry and houses in Gaza have gone instead to Hamas leaders, to amassing weapons, and to building a network of underground tunnels for weapons storage.

6. There is no occupation of Gaza. No Jews have been allowed to be in Gaza since 2005. Hamas is the elected government of Gaza and the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.

5. Many rockets fired toward Israel land instead in Gaza likely causing injuries and deaths to Palestinians.

4. The majority of people who have been killed in Gaza are men, ages 18-38. This is the demographic of combatants, not of civilians.

3. Israel is fighting against Hamas (not the people of Gaza) because they have been firing rockets into Israeli cities for years and had recently escalated these attacks. Israeli ground groups are trying to destroy the network of concrete tunnels Hamas has built for storing missiles and other weapons. These tunnels run under houses, hospitals, and mosques; some go into Israel, itself.

2. Hamas is fighting against the Israeli people with the goal of killing as many people as possible and terrorizing the country. Their stated goals are to eliminate Israel and kill Jews. Really.

1. Israel's goal is to make the rocket-firing stop and to have peace and quiet in Israel and Gaza.

July 15, 2014

When The Neighborhood Bully Fires Back

                                                                                                              photo: Hirek Israelbol                                                                                     

The neighborhood bully just lives to survive
He’s criticized and condemned for being alive
He’s not supposed to fight back, he’s supposed to have thick skin
He’s supposed to lay down and die when his door is kicked in
He’s the neighborhood bully
                                               -- Bob Dylan, “The Neighborhood Bully”                 


Much of English language media is returning to an old standby: Israel as the neighborhood bully. Sometimes this perspective is stated outright; more often it simply underlies the way stories are presented.

Hamas is usually referred to as a “militant group,” without indicating that it is also the elected government of Gaza. We get the impression of a renegade gang acting outside any official capacity. Working with Hamas is Islamic Jihad; though the two are aligned against Israel they are also in conflict with each other within the larger context of their shared Islamic extremism.

Yet, rarely is “Islamic extremism” mentioned, the widespread phenomenon that greatly overshadows the size of tiny Israel and negates its image as neighborhood bully.

Sometimes Hamas is referred to as a terrorist organization, often by saying Israel “considers” them so, suggesting this is Israeli propaganda.  But Hamas is designated a terrorist organization by many other countries, by the EU, US, Japan, Canada, Egypt and Jordan. And all of the rockets being fired from Gaza into Israel are aimed at civilians, pretty much the definition of terrorism. 

Even the Palestinian ambassador to the UN freely acknowledges that “every missile” from Gaza coming into Israel is “a crime against humanity.”  There have not been a lot of headlines conveying this message. Also a war crime is the launching of rockets from residential areas and endangering one’s own people.

When targeting Hamas fighters and their weapons, the IDF has many methods of warning civilians to leave. They call cellphones, send texts, and distribute leaflets so that people will get out of the way. They have a system of “knock on the roof” as warning and if they see people still in an area they will abort their mission.  During this week the Israeli government helped over 800 foreign nationals who wanted to leave Gaza to do so. 

But there are casualties. It is impossible to call people casualties without stopping right there to say: we should have no wars, ever. Yet, in the world as it is at the moment, in which Israel’s cities are under rocket fire, its government has the responsibility to protect its citizens.

Mention of that responsibility deflates the bully image, as does attributing Israel’s far fewer casualties to its building of bomb shelters, its requirement since the 1980’s that apartments have safe rooms, and its investment in a technology that dissolves incoming rockets in the air before they can do the damage they are intended to do.

Hamas has been firing rockets into Israeli towns for years. In 2008 and 2012 when the rocket firing escalated, and again now, the IDF fired back.  A lot of news coverage begins with Israeli strikes on Gaza as if the neighborhood bully just decided to flex his muscles for no reason.

Reporting that sirens sounded in particular cities or that the Iron Dome stopped rockets over Tel Aviv without ever suggesting that what is transpiring is the attempted murder of families in their homes helps create a familiar storyline in which Israel, because it is the stronger country, is to blame for there being a war at all. 

Bob Dylan wrote “The Neighborhood Bully” about Israel in 1983.

published at Honest Reporting


July 11, 2014

Israeli Kids Coping With Rockets




This song was written in 2008 by Sachar Bar, a teacher in Sderot, where 90% of kids and teens ages 4-18 showed signs of post traumatic stress due to the rocket fire that Sderot has experienced more than any other city in Israel. 

The video has gone viral in the past few days of rockets landing all over the country. In just three days, Hamas in Gaza has fired more than 300 rockets at Israeli civilians.

The song is called tzeva adom, color (code) red, the warning siren that sounds 15 to 60 seconds (depending on where you are in the country) before a rocket lands. That's the amount of time you have to get to a safe room or bomb shelter. 
   
  (Damage from rocket that exploded above a "pre-nursery" yesterday in Netivot, Israel)

July 09, 2014

Values, Murders, and Condemnations

                                             

Just at the end of the shiva period for her son, Naftali, Rachel Fraenkel offered condolences to the parents of Muhammed Abu Khdeir’s parents and condemned the killing. Every government official from the Prime Minister to local mayors, from politicians on the far right to those on the far left, along with Israel’s chief rabbis and the Israeli news sources have condemned the teen’s murder.

Adding my name to a long list of Jewish and Israeli bloggers’ condemnations felt at least like something tangible to do with the disbelief and shame that the killing evoked across the Jewish world and throughout Israel.

Objections have been leveled against those who point out that in Palestinian towns, people react with celebration, rather than with shame, to the murders of Neftali, Eyal, and Gilad; that unlike Israel’s government, the Hamas government praises kidnappings, advocates for continued such “operations,” and in this case increased their rocket firing at Israeli cities once the three boys were kidnapped. The killers of the Jewish boys are hailed as heroes, while the perpetrators of the murder of the Arab Israeli boy have shamed their whole country and will be shunned as well as jailed.

These differences represent contrasting values but not so for some, like Anshel Pfeffer who writes in Haaretz “We are all to blame...” for Muhammed’s death. And yet, certainly all Palestinians are not to blame for the terrible murders of Gilad, Eyal, and Naftali.

Isn’t acknowledging Israel’s basic humane values especially important when those values are betrayed?



June 30, 2014

No Words

IDF finds missing teens' bodies in West Bank

Eyal Yifrach, 19, Naftali Frenkel, 16, and Gil-Ad Shaer, 16, went missing near Hebron on June 12; blaming Hamas, Israel had spent past 18 days in extensive search of West Bank.

The bodies of Eyal Yifrach, 19, Naftali Frenkel, 16, and Gil-Ad Shaer, 16, were found in the area of Khirbet Aranava.
 
The three bodies were found around 6 pm in a shallow grave dug by their abductors in the wadi between Beit Khalil and Halhul. According
to preliminary estimates, the boys were shot shortly after their kidnapping, as planned beforehand by the abductors.

It is believed the kidnappers planned to kill the abductees and keep the bodies until they could be exchanged. As such, they never released any demands to Israel, in keeping with the mode of operations attributed to Hamas in the West Bank.

continue reading at YNetNews

June 21, 2014

# Bring Back Our Boys



Gilad, Naftali, and Eyal.

There is that empty space, that hollow dread, fear, and sadness. No word at all in more than a week.

No one has claimed responsibility, though the Israeli government is certain that the kidnappers are part of Hamas. Hamas leaders have praised the kidnapping as "heroic" but they are not saying they are the kidnappers. This may be because kidnapping 16-year-olds on their way home from school just doesn't sound all that heroic.

The IDF says that they have "foiled 64 kidnapping attempts" in the past year.

In spite of the "unity government" between Hamas and Fatah, Abu Mazen has spoken out against the kidnappings though also against the arrests Israel has made so far during the search for the teenagers. And there have been a lot of arrests including 50 convicts who had been released in the Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange.

There is a lot of press coverage that begins with Israel's forceful search for the boys.

Meanwhile, more than 25,000 people were at the Western Wall praying for the return of the Gilad, Naftali, and Eyal.  Seems like the only thing to do.

That and hashtag #bringbackourboys

May 29, 2014

MLA Guidelines for Opposing Resolutions Against Israel



                                                                                                              published at Times of Israel

Whether it fails or passes, the Modern Language Association’s resolution urging the US State Department to contest Israel’s denials of entry to the West Bank by United States academics” has prompted a valuable response from its opponents.

In their fact-sheet identifying what’s wrong with this resolution, MLA Members for Scholars’ Rights appear also to have identified what’s wrong with all the academic resolutions against Israel and calls for boycott I have seen.

The next time a faction of your university council or professional academic organization offers up Israel as the one country of the world most needing to be contested, censured or boycotted, these four points can help guide your opposition, for it is likely the resolution you are facing:

1. mischaracterizes
2. “overlooks key facts and context”
3. “is based on minimal, weak and unconvincing evidence”
4. “is biased and discriminatory”

Likely too, Israel has little to do with the mission of your student government or academic group. In this case, given the many problems directly affecting the Modern Language Association--the ever growing use of part-time faculty and the diminishing funding for and status of the Humanities are examples--one would expect a resolution on other topics to address some dire situation.

Yet only because the issue of travel restrictions has been mischaracterized is it even on the table. Israel simply has border policies consistent with other democratic countries.  And in the past year, for instance, only .023% of visa applications from US scholars were turned down by Israel.  A considerably larger percentage of Israeli scholars, 5.4%, were turned down when they applied for US visas. Larger contexts are overlooked in the resolution such as Israel’s security needs. And according to MLA Members for Scholars’ Rights, the minimal evidence for the resolution included only “four named cases of denied entry.” 

But what most defines resolutions like this one, as well as the more sweeping condemnations, is that they are biased and discriminatory. Though academics have recently faced “politically motivated state-sanctioned disruptions of travel in the United Arab Emirates, China, Bahrain, and United Kingdom, among others,” the only country criticized is Israel, and with little evidence. 

Likewise, Israel is the only country of the world threatened with academic boycott. The comments of the many MLA members who have signed a petition publically opposing the current resolution are well worth reading.

UPDATE:  The resolution failed!

April 05, 2014

Hebron Locals "Want Quiet Already"



                                                                                                                  Roman Lozovsky photo

Activists arrived in Hebron last week bringing Palestinian flags, cameras, and apparently, the intention of creating news of a confrontational demonstration. Their focus was the Israeli Supreme Court ruling that the “Peace House” building in Hebron does, in fact, legally belong to the Jewish owners who purchased it years ago.  

But, shortly after the protesters showed up, they were confronted by a number of Palestinian Arabs who, unlike the activists, actually live in Hebron.  Said one of the Palestinian residents of Hebron:

 "For a relatively long period there's been quiet and co-existence here between the Jewish and Palestinian residents, and this protest only damages the neighbors living nearby who want quiet already…"
 
We want quiet already” is not yet the brilliant slogan of a new moderate coalition; one can hope it will be. Meanwhile, these Palestinian locals not only prevented the protesters from making news, they “kicked them out of the city.”

Seems newsworthy to me. And it’s not hard to imagine the plentitude of headlines had the outsiders been escorted from the city by Jewish residents.

Will mainstream media pick up this story?

March 17, 2014

Afraid to Visit Israel?

                                                                                                        photo by Framing Israel

(published at Times of Israel)

In California, I interact with many people who have never been to Israel and many who imagine it is a place they would never visit.   Their questions have become predictable, enough so that I’ve developed a kind of routine for shifting a previously uncomfortable dynamic. Now, I almost enjoy these conversations (maybe it’s a perverse kind of enjoyment) and sometimes, the person with whom I’m speaking actually pauses to reconsider his or her assumptions, at least momentarily.

“You were in Israel? What was THAT like?” sometimes followed by “I bet you’re glad to be back!”  

“It was so much fun!” I watch their faces for the familiar quizzical look and, before I’m interrupted with question 2, I crowd in a whirlwind of typical tourist Israel:

“The beaches are beautiful. And there is so much going on, music festivals, art fairs, gorgeous places for hiking and being in nature. And the food! It’s amazing. There are great cafes, especially in Tel Aviv. And of course, there are all the historical sites.  In Jerusalem…” by which time, question 2 will certainly be interjected:

“But weren’t you afraid?”

“Well, yes.  It’s scary driving there. Sometimes I do rent a car but Israelis tend to drive really fast and there are people honking at you if you slow down at all. The roads are pretty good but I usually get around just on the trains and the busses...” About now, or sooner, question 3 shows up in an attempt to clarify:

“I mean, isn’t it dangerous?”

“It’s true they’re surrounded by countries who are run by terrorists or who harbor terrorists or who even tell children it’s a good idea to kill other children. It’s a very weird part of the world. So, Israel’s pretty much the expert country on safety.  And honestly, I feel safer there than I do here, certainly, safer than in any big city in America. I can walk around by myself at night, which I never do here.  There isn’t anything like the kind of crime we have in American cities.  And there’s a lot more care about safety; when you go into a public building or event there’s almost always a guard or security check….” Now, having raised the issue of security, question 4 appears, posing usually as the “gotcha” question:

“So I guess it’s pretty grim and militaristic?’

That’s the question that makes me laugh no matter how often or in how many forms I’ve heard it. I pull out my phone to show a few photos, of a Tel Aviv beach, or a shuk or shopping mall, or kids playing at a park. Or my favorite, the light rail in Jerusalem crowded with every demographic of the country, a picture confounding what they’ve heard about the “evils” of Israel and sometimes even leading to an actual conversation, one in which I get to ask questions, too:

“It’s really the most relaxed yet intense place I’ve ever been. Pretty much the opposite of ‘grim.’ You know that Israel is one of the happiest countries in the world, right?”


March 11, 2014

Cruise Ship Restricts Israeli Passengers at Request of Tunisia

                                                                              photo by Wikimedia Commons

Israeli passengers on the Norwegian Jade cruise ship were told at the last minute that they would not be allowed to disembark for the day stop in Tunis. After they had already filled out the forms to disembark, the cruise staff quietly told the 20 Israelis on board that they were "not welcomed by the Tunisian government" and that they could not leave the ship.

The staff "kept it a secret" from the other passengers but a Canadian passenger who had talked with the Israelis heard what had happened; he tried to reason with the ship's captain and then notified Jewish human rights organization, B'nai Brith.

The cruise line did not advise the passengers in advance that Israeli tourists would be confined to the ship for the stop. Other Jewish passengers were unaware that their coreligionists were being detained, since no public announcements were made. They were outraged when it became known, B’nai Brith Canada said.

The group’s CEO, Frank Dimant, said the Norwegian Cruise Line has “a responsibility to its passengers” to “advise them of this discriminatory policy in advance.”
“Better still the cruise line should avoid ports that have such policies,” he added.
Apparently still trying to keep the incident quiet, Norwegian Cruise Line, which is headquartered in Miami, issued a statement citing "a last minute decision by the Tunisian government" that kept "a small number of passengers with Israeli passports from going ashore" and condescendingly offering to "refund the port taxes to these guests."

Why would the cruise line enforce discrimination against Israelis?  Would they have so calmly and quietly kept tourists from another country confined to the ship while the rest of the passengers visited a port of call?

Under what flag does the Norwegian Jade sail?

UPDATE:  Norweigian Cruise Line has cancelled stops in Tunisia!

February 15, 2014

Israelis Saving Syrian Lives


                                              Israeli Field Hospital, Golan Heights  (Reuters )

Syria’s civil war has claimed the lives of around 130,000 people; it’s estimated that about one and a half million people have been displaced.  For the many needing medical attention, the best care comes from an “unlikely source”: Israel.  

The two countries have no diplomatic relations and Israel is considered an “enemy” by the Syrian government.  Meanwhile, Israel has set up three field hospitals in the Golan Heights and has been treating Syrians -- fighters as well as civilians -- in Israeli hospitals.  Upon returning to Syria, the patients could be harassed or killed as “collaborators with Israel,” so care is taken to keep their identity completely secret.

For Israeli medical staff, national or political identity is irrelevant. “We treat who ever comes in the door,” says the clinical director of Israel’s Western Galilee Medical Center, Masad Barhoum. Most of the patients are very badly hurt and receive “lifesaving medical treatment” in Israel.

Since Israel has kept their whole program of assistance as quiet as possible it’s not entirely easy to find out details, how many people have been treated, how many are fighters and how many civilians, and so on. It was only a month ago that any cameras were allowed into a field hospital and then only with the patients’ faces fully obscured so that they could not be identified.  

One of the most informative articles I’ve read, itself comes from an unlikely source, the United Arab Emirates' National Post. Neither the UAE or Syria allow Israelis into their countries. Yet, real life (and death) seem to intrude on these fixed positions. The National article begins:

When a rebel was shot and severely wounded during a new offensive on Syria’s southern front, his colleagues knew the only hope of saving his life was to get him to Israel. (continue here)


January 08, 2014

Israeli Natural Gas First Customer: Palestinian Power Company



Back in the everyday world, the "intractable" sides of an elusive peace settlement are engaged in mutually beneficial business agreements; Israel's first natural gas contract goes to the Palestinian Authority. 

Leviathan, Israel's largest natural gas offshore reserve, will supply the Palestinian Power Generation Company with fuel for a new power plant near Jenin. And not just in the short term; the agreement assures natural gas from Leviathan to the Jenin site for the next 20 years.

Also in the works is a plan to fill Jordan's energy needs. Of course, Jordan does have a peace agreement with Israel, but the advantages of Israeli supplied natural gas are notable: According to Bloomberg news, "For Jordan, which has seen fuel imports from Egypt disrupted by pipeline bombings in Sinai, deliveries from Israel would help to boost security of supply." 

It is also notable that business reporting, because it cheers for business and not for conflict news, often does not frame Israel negatively. Here, the International Business Times even includes, as an aside, the fact that the PA rather than Israel has governmental authority in the West Bank: 

Currently, the Palestinian Authority, which governs most of the Palestinian population of the West Bank, accounts for around 8 percent of Israel’s total electricity demand – and the Palestinian portion of that demand is increasing by approximately 6 percent annually, reported the Jerusalem Post.
Not only will the construction of the $300 million power plant help spur the local economy in Jenin, the new energy resource will help continue the recent economic growth in the West Bank.

The headline does have spin:  "Forget John Kerry's Shuttle Diplomacy: Israel and Palestinians Sign Historic Energy Deal."  

January 01, 2014

Against Israel Boycott: Ninety-Nine University Presidents So Far


Ninety-nine university presidents have come out against academic boycott of Israel and the number is growing every day. This is remarkable.

Perhaps, the small number (three) and small size of the professional organizations endorsing boycott, along with the enormous media coverage given to the recent boycott vote by the Association of American Studies, has prompted university administrators to get out in front of the issue before more divisive academic calls for boycott occur. Perhaps a real concern for academic freedom and fairness prompting major university presidents to speak out encourages the rest to join in.  Included so far are the University of California, Davis, San Diego, Irvine, and Berkeley, the City University of New York, Stanford, Harvard, Cornell, Yale, Johns Hopkins, University of Chicago, Princeton, MIT and a long list of other schools; the list is impressive.

Will this impact the amount of attention given to singling out Israel, among all the countries of the world, for condemnation by professors?  Or will some feel emboldened to "speak truth to power" across the faculty/administration divide?

Encouraging, however, is that the largest professional organization of faculty: the American Association of University Professors, which took a position condemning academic boycotts in 2005, issued a new statement specifically addressed to the ASA opposing boycotts of Israel. (Is any other country boycotted by academics?)

Whatever happens next, the groundswell of response against boycott from university leaders across the US speaks loudly and reasonably for the university as a center for the "free exchange of ideas."  Boycotts accomplish only the shutting down of any possible discussion.

Now, if the media will give as much space to the many against, as they do to the few for boycott, we'll really be getting somewhere.


UPDATE -- More than 200 University presidents now have opposed the boycott.